AI Governance & Secure Deployment — Regulated Industries

Your AI agents are
live. Unsecured.
Legally exposed.

Navard delivers certified AI governance, secure agent deployment, and confidential computing infrastructure for law firms, hospitals, financial institutions, and government contractors. Every assessment is signed by an AIGP-credentialed M.S. Cybersecurity professional with more than a decade of enterprise security experience.

7 Day Rapid Delivery — AI Risk Assessment & Signed Defensibility Report
Request Your Free AI Exposure Report View Services & Pricing
✓ AIGP Certified ✓ M.S. Cybersecurity ✓ 7-Day Delivery ✓ Signed Reports
⚠ EU AI Act — Full enforcement August 2026 — Fines up to €35M or 7% global revenue   ·   ⚠ HIPAA 2026 — Encryption now mandatory — Addressable safeguard removed   ·   ⚠ California SB-53 — AI transparency active law — Disclosure obligations in effect   ·   ⚠ OMB M-26-04 — Federal AI procurement rules — GovCon compliance required   ·   ⚠ FTC / CFPB — Explainable AI mandatory for lending — Black-box models prohibited   ·   ⚠ EU AI Act — Full enforcement August 2026 — Fines up to €35M or 7% global revenue   ·   ⚠ HIPAA 2026 — Encryption now mandatory   ·   ⚠ California SB-53 — AI transparency active law   ·   ⚠ OMB M-26-04 — Federal AI procurement rules   ·   ⚠ FTC / CFPB — Black-box AI models prohibited
Assessments built on the following regulatory frameworks
HIPAA2026 Security Rule
ABAEthics Opinion 512
FINRAAI Supervision Rules
EU AI ActFull Enforcement 2026
NISTAI Risk Management Framework
OMBM-26-04 Federal AI Policy
[CLIENT LOGO 1]
[CLIENT LOGO 2]
[CLIENT LOGO 3]
[CLIENT LOGO 4]
The Regulatory Landscape — 2026

Four walls came down
simultaneously.

Your organization is operating inside a compliance minefield that did not exist 18 months ago. Most leadership teams do not know yet.

Federal — August 2026
EU AI Act

Full enforcement now active. Any company with EU operations or customers must classify, document, and govern every AI system. US location is no protection.

Fine: €35M or 7% revenue
Healthcare — January 2026
HIPAA 2026

The addressable loophole is gone. Encryption at rest and in transit is now mandatory for every AI system that touches patient data. No exceptions.

Fine: $1.9M per violation/year
Legal & Finance — 2026
ABA + FTC/CFPB

Attorneys are personally accountable for AI-assisted work product. Financial AI must provide explainable logic for every automated decision. Black-box models prohibited.

Risk: Bar sanctions + FTC action
Federal Contractors — 2026
OMB M-26-04

All federal-facing AI systems must demonstrate verifiable, neutral outputs. GovCon firms that cannot prove compliance risk contract termination and debarment.

Risk: Contract termination
87%
of organizations using AI have no governance framework in place today
$4.6M
average cost of a shadow AI data breach — $670K more than a standard breach
171%
average ROI on enterprise agentic AI — most deployments stall due to security gaps
The Cost of Non-Compliance

The math always
favors acting now.

A Navard audit costs a fraction of a single regulatory violation. Here is what non-compliance actually costs — compared to what we charge.

Industry Max violation exposure Our audit cost
Healthcare $1,900,000 / yr Starting $10,000
Legal Bar sanctions + malpractice liability Starting $10,000
Financial FTC / CFPB enforcement Starting $10,000
EU Operations €35,000,000 or 7% rev Starting $15,000
GovCon Contract termination Starting $10,000
The bottom line
A $10,000 audit that eliminates a $1.9M annual HIPAA exposure delivers a 190-to-1 return on risk reduction. No other security investment in your portfolio comes close. And unlike a fine, the audit produces a signed legal asset you can show your board, your insurer, and any regulator who asks.
✎
Every report is personally signed
Not generated by a platform. Not delivered by a junior analyst. Signed by an AIGP-credentialed M.S. Cybersecurity professional. That signature provides documented evidence of due diligence and governance oversight — suitable for regulatory reviews, board inquiries, and insurance underwriting.
⏳
Delivered in 7 days
With EU AI Act enforcement active and HIPAA deadlines passed, you do not have six months to wait for a Big 4 engagement. Our 7-day delivery model was built for exactly this urgency.
🔒
Insurer and board ready
Insurers are now asking about AI governance frameworks before renewing cyber policies. Boards are asking about AI risk. Our Defensibility Report answers both in one document your leadership can actually use.
📈
Starting at $10,000
Big 4 firms charge $500,000 minimum for AI governance engagements. We deliver equivalent credentialed expertise at a price point your organization can act on within this budget cycle.
Our Services — Four Pillars

Security and compliance
built in from the start.

Four integrated service pillars covering every stage of the AI governance lifecycle — from initial risk assessment through secure deployment, private infrastructure, and ongoing compliance. Every engagement is signed by the same credentialed expert who scopes it.

Pillar A — The Auditor
AI Risk Assessment
Every assessment is personally signed by an AIGP-credentialed M.S. Cybersecurity professional — producing a legal protection document defensible in boardrooms, regulatory reviews, and insurance underwriting reviews. Delivered in 7 days.
  • Complete AI inventory — approved and shadow AI discovered
  • Prompt injection, RAG poisoning, and model extraction vulnerability testing
  • OWASP LLM Top 10 assessment — all 10 vulnerability categories tested
  • Non-human identity (NHI) sprawl audit — agent credential and permission review
  • EU AI Act risk tier classification, HIPAA 2026, ABA, and FTC compliance mapping
  • Signed Defensibility Report with prioritized remediation roadmap
TierScopeTimelineInvestment
Tier 1 — Essential Up to 5 AI systems · NIST AI RMF baseline · Shadow AI discovery · Signed Defensibility Report 7 days $10,000
Tier 2 — Comprehensive Up to 15 systems · Full regulatory mapping · OWASP LLM Top 10 · EU AI Act classification · Board-ready report 14 days $22,000
Tier 3 — Enterprise Unlimited systems · Multi-regulation · Full adversarial testing · Board presentation included 21–30 days $40,000+
Pillar B — The Deployer
Secure Agent Deployment
We build AI agents your legal counsel and compliance team can approve — security architecture, governance documentation, and adversarial red-team testing included.
  • LangChain, LangGraph, Azure AI, and n8n agent architecture and development
  • Least-privilege access controls, DLP integration, and full audit logging
  • Prompt injection hardening, insecure output handling, and excessive agency controls
  • SSE and API security design — every integration secured before it is written
  • Pre-production Garak and PyRIT adversarial testing — nothing ships untested
  • Six-document Governance Package and signed client acceptance
Starting at $25,000
Pillar C — The Vault
Confidential Infrastructure
Hardware-secured private AI enclaves on Azure or AWS. Your agents run in zero-knowledge environments — not even Navard can access your data inside The Vault.
  • Azure Confidential Computing DC-series and AWS Nitro Enclaves
  • Private LLM hosting — Llama 3, Mistral, or custom models
  • Zero-knowledge architecture — encrypted in-memory processing
  • 24/7 monitoring, SLA-backed uptime, and compliance reporting
  • 4-hour incident response SLA for all Vault clients
$3,000 – $8,000 / month
Pillar D — The Retainer
Ongoing AI Governance
Monthly compliance monitoring, regulatory alerts, quarterly signed board reports, and on-call advisory — keeping your AI governance current as regulations evolve.
  • Regulatory monitoring with 48-hour change alerts
  • Quarterly signed AI Governance Report for board and insurers
  • Live compliance dashboard — real-time control status
  • 4 hours per month direct founder advisory access
  • AI incident response support — 4-hour response SLA
$3,000 – $5,000 / month
01
Free AI Exposure Report
Request your free report. We identify your three highest AI risk exposures and deliver a written summary within 48 hours — before any paid engagement begins.
Day 0 — Free
02
AI Inventory + Audit
We identify every AI tool in use — including shadow AI — and assess each against NIST AI RMF, OWASP, and your regulatory obligations.
Day 1–5
03
Signed Report + Roadmap
You receive a signed Defensibility Report covering every finding, every regulatory gap, and a prioritized remediation roadmap.
Day 6–7
04
Deploy + Govern
Secure agents deployed and compliance monitoring active. Your organization has documented governance and a signed report ready for any regulatory review, board inquiry, or insurer request.
Week 2+
Why Organizations Choose Navard

Platform software, large firms,
and the right fit.

Every buyer in this space faces the same question: should I buy software, hire a Big 4 firm, or find a specialist? Here is the honest answer for regulated industries.

Platform Software
SaaS AI governance tools
~$250/month
Regulatory Output
Dashboard only. No signed report. No expert opinion. Not defensible in a regulatory proceeding.
Personal Accountability
No human accountable. Software cannot sign a document. Vendors disclaim all liability in their terms.
Time to Clarity
Setup takes weeks. You govern it yourself. Ongoing effort required from your internal team.
Price Point
Low monthly cost. High internal labor cost. No legal protection produced.
Regulated Industry Depth
Generic frameworks. Do not account for HIPAA BAA requirements, ABA Ethics Opinion 512, or FTC explainability mandates.
Big 4 Consultancy
Enterprise consulting firms
$250,000+ minimum
Regulatory Output
Signed report with generic framework application. Partner-reviewed. Defensible but not specialized.
Personal Accountability
Partner accountability. Reports are institutional, not individual. Difficult to escalate to a single expert.
Time to Clarity
Months to start. Long procurement cycle. RFP required. Junior analysts do the work.
Price Point
Enterprise consulting engagements are lengthy, resource-intensive, and priced for Fortune 500 budgets. Mid-market organizations are typically underserved.
Regulated Industry Depth
Strong on process. Weaker on AI-specific regulatory nuance. Teams rotated between clients and sectors.
Navard
AI governance specialist
Starting at $10,000
Regulatory Output
Signed Defensibility Report by AIGP-credentialed founder. Defensible in regulatory reviews, board presentations, and insurance underwriting.
Personal Accountability
Founder personally signs every assessment. One credentialed expert accountable for every finding. No delegation to junior staff.
Time to Clarity
7-day delivery. Start within 48 hours of engagement. Board-ready report delivered in one week.
Price Point
Starting at $10,000. Fixed scope. Fixed price. Accessible to mid-market regulated organizations.
Regulated Industry Depth
HIPAA 2026, ABA Ethics Opinion 512, EU AI Act, FTC/CFPB, OMB M-26-04. This is the only thing we do.
No assessment. No engagement. No obligation.
Your three highest AI risk exposures identified. A written summary delivered within 48 hours.
Request Your Free AI Exposure Report → View Pricing
Pillar C — The Vault

Private AI
infrastructure.
Zero knowledge.

Hardware-secured confidential computing enclaves on Azure Confidential Computing DC-series and AWS Nitro Enclaves. Deployed in 14 days. Your agents run inside hardware-encrypted memory — not even Navard can see your data inside The Vault.

Vault Starter
1 private LLM · 4 vCPU / 32GB RAM · Basic monitoring · Monthly compliance report
$3,000/ month + $5K setup
Vault Professional
3 private LLMs · 8 vCPU / 64GB RAM · 24/7 monitoring · Compliance dashboard
$5,000/ month + $5K setup
Vault Enterprise
Unlimited LLMs · 16+ vCPU / 128GB+ RAM · Dedicated support · Custom SLA
$8,000+/ month + $10K setup
Discuss Vault Requirements →
● Deployed in 14 days  ● SLA-backed 99.9% uptime  ● 4-hour incident response
How The Vault works — Trusted Execution Environment architecture
CLIENT DATA PHI / Legal / Financial Data AES-256 encrypted ENCRYPTED IN TRANSIT TRUSTED EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT Hardware Attested · Azure DC-series / AWS Nitro ENCRYPTED MEMORY (RAM) Private LLM Inference Llama 3 / Mistral / Custom model ZERO-KNOWLEDGE GUARANTEE Navard cannot read client data. Vendor cannot read client data. AI OUTPUT Inference result Zero leakage ✕ External access blocked Your organization Your organization
All computation occurs inside hardware-encrypted memory. Input, model weights, and output never exist in plaintext outside the enclave. The enclave is not accessible by Navard, the cloud provider, or any third party.
Three ways to deploy
01
Fully Managed Cloud Enclave
Navard provisions and manages the entire Azure or AWS confidential computing environment. You never touch infrastructure. We handle security, patching, monitoring, and compliance reporting.
Ideal forOrganizations without internal cloud teams or those with strict data sovereignty requirements
Setup timeline14 days from contract signature to live environment
Investment$5,000 setup + $3,000–$8,000/month
02
Hybrid Deployment
Your organization maintains its existing cloud environment. Navard configures and governs the confidential computing layer on top, integrating with your existing Azure or AWS tenancy without replacing it.
Ideal forOrganizations with existing cloud infrastructure who need a secure AI layer without a full migration
Setup timeline21–28 days depending on existing environment complexity
Investment$8,000 setup + monthly governance retainer
03
On-Premises Consultation
For organizations that cannot use any cloud infrastructure — certain government contractors, highly regulated healthcare systems, or classified environments — Navard designs and documents a private on-premises confidential AI architecture for your internal team to implement.
Ideal forGovCon firms with classified environments, healthcare systems with strict on-premises mandates, and organizations under specific data residency requirements
Setup timelineArchitecture delivered in 30 days. Implementation by your team.
InvestmentFixed-fee architecture consultation starting at $15,000
Industries We Serve

Regulated industries
cannot wait.

Your compliance officers, legal counsel, and board members are under active regulatory pressure. Click any industry to see the specific regulations, risks, and Navard services that apply to your organization.

⚖
Legal
ABA Ethics · CA SB-1047 · SB-53 · NIST AI RMF · Attorney accountability for AI work product
⚠ Bar sanctions · Malpractice exposure
Click to see regulations, risks, and services ↓
🏥
Healthcare
HIPAA 2026 · HITECH · HHS Guidance · FDA AI/ML · PHI encryption now mandatory
⚠ $1.9M per violation per year
Click to see regulations, risks, and services ↓
Applicable Regulations
  • HIPAA 2026 Security Rule Update — Removes the addressable safeguard category. Encryption at rest and in transit is now mandatory for all AI systems handling PHI.
  • HHS AI Guidance 2026 — Requires documented human oversight for clinical AI decision support systems. BAA mandatory for all AI vendors touching PHI.
  • FDA AI/ML Action Plan — Software as Medical Device (SaMD) rules apply to AI used in clinical decision-making. Pre-market notification requirements.
  • HITECH Act — Breach notification requirements apply when AI systems cause unauthorized PHI exposure. Shadow AI incidents qualify as reportable breaches.
AI Risks Your Organization Faces Now
  • Clinical and administrative staff using public AI tools to process patient information without Business Associate Agreements in place.
  • AI diagnostic or documentation tools deployed without formal human oversight protocols required under HHS guidance.
  • No AI inventory means compliance officers cannot confirm PHI is not flowing through unauthorized AI systems during an HHS audit.
  • AI vendor relationships with no BAA represent active HIPAA violations with $1.9M per violation per year.
Navard Services for Healthcare
  • Complete AI inventory with PHI exposure analysis — including shadow AI in clinical departments
  • HIPAA 2026 compliance mapping with mandatory encryption verification
  • BAA requirement review for all current AI vendor relationships
  • Signed Defensibility Report for compliance officer and board presentation
Request Healthcare AI Exposure Report →
🏢
Financial Services
FTC · CFPB · SEC 2026 AI guidance · GLBA · Explainable AI required for all automated decisions
⚠ FTC enforcement · CFPB sanctions
Click to see regulations, risks, and services ↓
Applicable Regulations
  • FTC Safeguards Rule — Requires financial institutions to implement safeguards for customer information. AI systems handling customer data fall directly within scope.
  • CFPB AI Explainability Requirements — Automated lending and credit decisions must provide explainable rationale. Black-box AI models are prohibited for consumer-facing decisions.
  • SEC 2026 AI Guidance — Investment advisers using AI must disclose AI usage to clients and demonstrate that AI recommendations are in client interests.
  • GLBA — Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy and security requirements apply to AI systems processing non-public personal financial information.
AI Risks Your Organization Faces Now
  • AI-assisted credit, lending, or investment decisions that cannot produce explainable rationale — creating direct CFPB enforcement exposure.
  • Customer-facing AI systems deployed without SEC-required disclosure documentation for advisory firms.
  • AI tools processing non-public personal financial information without documented GLBA-compliant security controls.
  • No AI governance framework means every AI-assisted decision is undocumented and indefensible in an examination.
Navard Services for Financial Services
  • FTC Safeguards Rule AI system inventory and compliance mapping
  • CFPB explainability assessment for all automated decision systems
  • SEC AI disclosure documentation for registered investment advisers
  • Signed Defensibility Report suitable for regulatory examination response
Request Financial AI Exposure Report →
🏛
Gov Contractors
OMB M-26-04 · CMMC · NIST SP 800-171 · Verifiable AI outputs required for all federal work
⚠ Contract termination · Debarment
Click to see regulations, risks, and services ↓
Applicable Regulations
  • OMB M-26-04 — Federal AI procurement now requires verifiable, neutral AI outputs. All AI used in federal work must demonstrate governance compliance. Non-compliance risks contract termination and debarment.
  • CMMC 2.0 — Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification requirements apply to AI systems handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
  • NIST SP 800-171 — Protection of CUI requirements extend to AI systems that process, store, or transmit covered data.
  • FAR/DFARS AI Clauses — Emerging contract clauses requiring disclosure and governance documentation for AI use in contract performance.
AI Risks Your Organization Faces Now
  • AI tools used by staff to process or summarize documents containing CUI without documented governance controls or access restrictions.
  • No OMB M-26-04 compliance documentation means inability to respond to contracting officer inquiries about AI governance.
  • AI-generated deliverables to federal clients that cannot demonstrate neutrality and verifiability as required under the OMB memo.
  • Shadow AI use on federal contracts creating FAR violation exposure and potential False Claims Act liability.
Navard Services for GovCon
  • OMB M-26-04 compliance assessment for all AI used in contract performance
  • CUI handling review for AI systems under CMMC and NIST SP 800-171
  • AI governance documentation package for contracting officer review
  • Signed Defensibility Report suitable for contract compliance files
Request GovCon AI Exposure Report →
Illustrative Engagement Scenarios

Proof of
what we deliver.

The following scenarios illustrate the scope, findings, and outcomes of engagements Navard delivers across each service pillar. Each scenario is grounded in real regulatory frameworks and documented industry-specific AI risks. All client engagements are conducted under NDA.

Pillar A — AI Risk Assessment
Healthcare — Regional Hospital Group — 300 Beds
Client details anonymized under NDA
Tier 2 AI Risk Assessment + Ongoing Compliance Retainer
  • Discovered 14 unauthorized AI tools in active clinical and administrative use — zero covered by Business Associate Agreements
  • Identified direct HIPAA 2026 violation exposure: nursing staff entering patient intake notes into public ChatGPT via personal devices
  • NIST AI RMF gap analysis revealed zero governance controls across all four functions — Govern, Map, Measure, Manage
  • OWASP LLM Top 10 assessment of two internally-deployed AI documentation tools found prompt injection and data leakage vulnerabilities
  • Regulatory Compliance Matrix produced covering HIPAA 2026, HHS AI guidance, and FDA AI/ML action plan
  • Signed Tier 2 Defensibility Report delivered in 14 days — presented to board and compliance committee
Outcome Shadow AI eliminated across all departments. BAAs executed with three AI vendors. HIPAA 2026 mandatory encryption verified. Insurer reduced cyber liability premium at renewal. Client enrolled in $4,000/month ongoing compliance retainer.
Pillar B — Secure Agent Deployment
Financial Services — Registered Investment Adviser — $2.4B AUM
Client details anonymized under NDA
Secure AI Agent Deployment — Client Portfolio Analysis Agent
  • Client required an AI agent to analyze portfolio holdings, flag concentration risk, and generate plain-language summaries for relationship managers — without client financial data leaving their environment
  • Security architecture designed first: least-privilege API access, audit logging for every agent action, human review gate before any output reached client-facing staff
  • Agent built on LangChain with Azure AI integration — all API calls routed through client’s existing Azure tenancy, no data transmitted to third-party LLM endpoints
  • Pre-production red team using Garak and PyRIT: identified and remediated one prompt injection vulnerability and two instances of excessive agency before deployment
  • SEC 2026 AI disclosure documentation and GLBA compliance attestation produced as part of governance package
  • Staged deployment: pilot with 3 relationship managers for 2 weeks, then full rollout to 18 staff
Outcome Agent deployed and operating in production. Zero security incidents in first 90 days. SEC disclosure documentation accepted by compliance counsel. Client enrolled in quarterly governance review retainer. Relationship managers report 40% reduction in manual portfolio summary time.
Pillar C — Confidential Computing Infrastructure
Legal — 85-Attorney Regional Law Firm
Client details anonymized under NDA
Vault Professional — Private LLM Deployment for Legal Research
  • Firm wanted to deploy an LLM for case law research and document summarization — but could not use public AI APIs due to attorney-client privilege concerns and client confidentiality obligations
  • Public cloud AI services rejected by general counsel: vendor terms of service permitted training on submitted data, creating privilege and confidentiality exposure
  • Navard provisioned an Azure Confidential Computing DC-series enclave — all inference occurs inside hardware-encrypted Trusted Execution Environment
  • Mistral 7B model deployed privately inside the enclave — zero inference data leaves the secure environment, not accessible by Azure, Navard, or any third party
  • Hardware attestation certificate produced, confirming enclave integrity before any client data entered the environment
  • Full deployment completed in 14 days from signed engagement to live environment
Outcome Attorneys now use private AI for case research without privilege or confidentiality exposure. General counsel approved deployment based on hardware attestation and zero-knowledge architecture documentation. Vault Professional active at $5,000/month. Firm reports 3-hour average reduction per attorney per week on research tasks.
Pillar D — Ongoing Compliance Retainer
Government Contractor — Defense Subcontractor — 120 Employees
Client details anonymized under NDA
AI Risk Assessment + OMB M-26-04 Compliance Retainer
  • Contracting officer requested documentation of AI governance practices before contract renewal — firm had no documented AI governance framework
  • Tier 1 AI Risk Assessment revealed 6 AI tools in use by proposal writing and document review teams processing Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
  • OMB M-26-04 compliance gap: AI-generated deliverables to federal clients lacked verifiability and neutrality documentation required under the memo
  • CMMC 2.0 mapping confirmed CUI handling requirements applied to two of the six AI tools — immediate remediation required
  • Signed Defensibility Report and AI Governance Policy Package delivered and submitted to contracting officer as compliance evidence
  • Enrolled in $3,000/month retainer for continuous regulatory monitoring and quarterly governance reviews
Outcome Contract renewed. Contracting officer accepted governance documentation. CUI-handling AI tools brought into CMMC 2.0 compliance. OMB M-26-04 verifiability documentation now produced for every AI-assisted deliverable. Quarterly governance reports issued to CISO for contract compliance file.
Sample deliverable — Signed Defensibility Report (redacted)
NAVARD CONFIDENTIAL
AI Governance Assessment
Signed Defensibility Report
[Client name redacted]  ·  April 2026  ·  Tier 1 Engagement
Executive Summary
AI System Inventory — 14 Systems Identified
SYS-001████████████High Risk
SYS-002████████████High Risk
SYS-003████████████Medium Risk
SYS-004████████████Medium Risk
+ 10 additional systems documented in full report
NIST AI RMF Gap Analysis
Sakht — Founder, Navard LLC
M.S. Cybersecurity  ·  AIGP (IAPP)  ·  CISM (ISACA)
Signed: April 2026
Delivered by email within 48 hours of your request.
Your three highest AI risk exposures. A written summary. A prioritized first action for each. At no cost.
Request Your Free AI Exposure Report →
Live Governance Ledger

Your AI compliance
in real time.

Every client on a Navard retainer receives a live compliance dashboard showing exactly which controls are verified, which are pending, and what your regulatory exposure looks like right now.

Control IDFrameworkStatus
AI-GV-01NIST AI RMF GovernVerified — 3m ago
EU-HR-03EU AI Act High-RiskVerified — 1h ago
HP-ENC-02HIPAA EncryptionVerified — 2h ago
AI-MP-07NIST AI RMF MeasureReview Due — 2d
SH-AI-01Shadow AI InventoryVerified — 6h ago
EU-GP-04GPAI DocumentationVerified — 1d ago
AG-SEC-09Agent Security PolicyPending Review
🔐
Continuous Control Monitoring
Every compliance control verified automatically on a rolling basis. You always know your exact posture — not just on audit day, but every day of the year.
📋
Regulatory Alert System
Receive immediate notification when a new regulation affects your AI stack, with a pre-built response plan specific to your systems and industry.
✍
Signed Quarterly Reports
Every quarter you receive an expert-signed compliance report suitable for board presentation, regulatory submission, or insurer review.
🛡
Incident Response on Call
If an AI-related security event occurs, Navard responds within 4 hours. Containment, documentation, regulatory notification — handled.
About Navard

Where deep security
expertise meets
AI governance.

Navard delivers certified AI governance, secure agent deployment, and confidential computing infrastructure for law firms, hospitals, financial institutions, and government contractors. Every assessment is signed by an AIGP-credentialed M.S. Cybersecurity professional with more than a decade of enterprise security experience.

M.S. Cybersecurity AIGP — IAPP CISM — ISACA ISO 42001 Lead Auditor 10+ Years Enterprise Security
Why clients choose and stay with Navard
01
Credential depth. M.S. Cybersecurity, AIGP, CISM, and ISO 42001 Lead Auditor — a credential stack that takes years to build and positions every signed report as an expert legal opinion, not a software checklist.
02
Regulatory authority. Our Signed Defensibility Report is a legal protection asset that holds up in board inquiries, regulatory reviews, and insurance underwriting. This combination of credentials and signed expert opinion is typically only available through Big 4 engagements at ten times the cost.
03
Infrastructure depth. The Vault’s confidential computing layer gives clients hardware-secured private AI that no public cloud can replicate — and takes 6–12 months for any competitor to build from scratch.
04
Embedded trust. Once Navard is woven into a client’s compliance infrastructure — monitoring controls, producing board reports, governing agents — the relationship is institutional, not transactional. Clients stay for years.
🌎
Serving Regulated Organizations Nationally
Navard works with law firms, hospital systems, and financial institutions across the United States. Remote engagements conducted at no additional cost. On-site visits available for enterprise deployments.
Technology Partners & Ecosystem

Built on trusted
infrastructure.

Navard builds on the leading cloud, compliance, and security platforms. Our work runs on Azure and AWS infrastructure. Professional association memberships are active. Cloud infrastructure partnerships are being established.

☁
Microsoft Azure Confidential Computing — Vault infrastructure
☁
AWS Partner Network Nitro Enclaves — Vault infrastructure
🔐
Vanta GRC platform — compliance automation
📊
Apptega Compliance framework management
🌟
IAPP AIGP certified member
🌟
ISACA CISM certified member

Client organization logos added upon written authorization.

Resource Center

Stay current.
Stay protected.

Practical AI governance guidance for compliance leaders, general counsel, and CISOs navigating the 2026 regulatory landscape.

By Regulation
By Industry
Article
Healthcare — HIPAA 2026
What the 2026 HIPAA Security Rule Update Means for Healthcare AI Systems
The removal of the “addressable” safeguard category in January 2026 changed the compliance landscape for every healthcare organization using AI. This guide explains exactly what changed, which systems are now out of compliance, and the three steps every hospital and clinic needs to take immediately.
April 20268 min read
Article
Legal — ABA Ethics
ABA Ethics Opinion 512: What Every Law Firm Needs to Know Before Using AI
The American Bar Association’s formal ethics opinion on AI creates direct personal accountability for supervising attorneys. We break down the exact obligations, the shadow AI exposure most firms do not know they have, and what a compliant AI governance policy for a law firm actually looks like in practice.
March 20266 min read
Article
Regulatory — EU AI Act
The EU AI Act is Now Fully Enforceable: What US Companies Are Still Getting Wrong
The most common misconception we encounter: “We are a US company, so the EU AI Act does not apply to us.” It does. If you sell to EU customers, use AI whose outputs affect people in the EU, or deploy AI in EU-connected workflows, you have compliance obligations — and fines up to €35M.
February 20267 min read
Checklist
All Industries — NIST AI RMF
2026 AI Compliance Checklist: 40 Controls Every Organization Must Verify
A complete checklist covering NIST AI RMF Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage functions. Mapped to EU AI Act, HIPAA 2026, and FTC requirements. Formatted for compliance officer review and board presentation.
🔒 Free Download — Email required
Updated April 2026PDF · 8 pages
Free Checklist
2026 AI Compliance Checklist
Enter your details below to receive the checklist by email immediately.
We do not sell or share your information. You may receive occasional AI governance updates from Navard. Unsubscribe anytime.
Free AI Exposure Report

Know your risk
before regulators do.

Request your complimentary AI Exposure Report. No obligation. Within 48 hours, you receive a written summary covering your three highest AI risk exposures and a prioritized first action for each.

⏰Written report delivered within 48 hours
📧All inquiries responded to within 24 hours
🔒NDA available before any information is shared
01
Your top three AI risk exposures identified
Based on your industry, regulatory environment, and the information you share, we identify the three exposures carrying the highest legal and financial consequence for your organization right now.
02
A one-page written summary delivered within 48 hours
Not a generic checklist. A written assessment specific to your organization, signed by an AIGP-credentialed expert, delivered by email within two business days of your request.
03
A prioritized first action for each risk
Each identified exposure comes with a concrete, specific first step your team can take immediately — with or without engaging Navard further.
📧 contact@navard.ai 📍 Serving clients nationally — remote and on-site visits LinkedIn →
Professional Standards & Industry Alignment

Credentials that
hold up under scrutiny.

Every credential listed below is earned, active, and independently verifiable. These are the standards that govern how Navard operates and what every signed assessment is measured against.

IAPP
AI Governance Professional
The AIGP certification from the International Association of Privacy Professionals is the leading credential in AI governance, covering EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and global regulatory frameworks. Every Navard assessment is delivered under this certification standard.
✓ AIGP Certified
ISACA
Certified Information Security Manager
CISM certification from ISACA validates expertise in information security governance, risk management, incident response, and program development. The governance frameworks applied in every Navard engagement are built on CISM-standard methodology.
✓ CISM Certified
Academic
Master of Science — Cybersecurity
Graduate-level academic foundation in security architecture, risk management, cryptography, and enterprise security programs. The M.S. in Cybersecurity is the academic basis for every signed Defensibility Report Navard delivers.
✓ M.S. Cybersecurity
Assessments aligned with
NISTAI Risk Management Framework 1.0
ISO 42001AI Management System Standard
OWASPLLM Top 10 Vulnerability Framework
MITREATLAS AI Threat Matrix
Common Questions

Questions buyers
ask before calling.

Enterprise buyers research before they engage. These are the questions compliance officers, general counsel, and CISOs ask most frequently.

Does Navard replace our legal counsel or compliance team?+
No. Navard delivers cybersecurity and governance assessments — not legal advice. Our Signed Defensibility Report documents your AI risk posture and due diligence. Your legal counsel interprets regulatory applicability and advises on legal obligations. We work alongside your existing legal and compliance teams, not in place of them.
Can Navard work alongside our existing MSP or IT vendor?+
Yes. Navard's AI governance work operates at the policy, compliance, and security architecture layer — not at the helpdesk or infrastructure management layer. We regularly work in environments where an MSP manages day-to-day IT operations. Our assessments and deployments are designed to integrate with, not replace, existing vendor relationships.
How long does onboarding take before work begins?+
Typically three to five business days from signed engagement letter to active discovery. Onboarding covers scope confirmation, a read-only access request for relevant systems, and a brief intake form completed by your team. For a Tier 1 AI Risk Assessment, the full engagement from onboarding to signed report delivery is 7 business days.
Do you deploy AI models or only assess existing systems?+
Both. Pillar A covers assessment of existing AI systems. Pillar B covers secure design and deployment of new AI agents. Pillar C provides the confidential computing infrastructure to run those agents privately. Clients typically begin with a Pillar A assessment and progress to deployment once the governance foundation is established.
What does the Signed Defensibility Report actually contain?+
The report contains a complete AI system inventory, NIST AI RMF gap analysis across all four functions, regulatory compliance mapping for your applicable frameworks, an OWASP LLM Top 10 security assessment for deployed agents, a risk register with severity ratings, a prioritized remediation roadmap, and a signed attestation by the AIGP-credentialed founder. It is formatted for board presentation, regulatory submission, and insurance underwriting.
How does Navard handle confidential client information during an assessment?+
All client data is handled under a signed Master Services Agreement with mutual NDA provisions before any work begins. Healthcare clients receive a Business Associate Agreement prior to any engagement involving PHI. Data accessed during assessments is documented, used only for the defined engagement scope, and deleted within 30 days of engagement close unless contractual retention is required. Navard operates under the same governance standards it recommends to clients.
Does the EU AI Act apply to our US-based organization?+
It may. The EU AI Act applies to any organization that places AI systems on the EU market or whose AI systems affect people in the EU — regardless of where the organization is headquartered. Many US companies incorrectly assume they are exempt. Navard's EU Nexus Assessment determines whether and how the Act applies to your specific operations. Organizations should consult qualified legal counsel regarding the precise legal applicability of any regulation to their circumstances.
What is the minimum engagement size?+
The smallest paid engagement is a Tier 1 AI Risk Assessment at $10,000, covering up to five AI systems with a signed Defensibility Report delivered in seven days. The free AI Exposure Report — which identifies your three highest risk exposures in writing within 48 hours — is available at no cost and requires no commitment.